The candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party in the 2023 governorship election in Sokoto State, Sa’idu Umar, has rejected Saturday’s tribunal judgment upholding the election of Gov. Ahmed Aliyu.
This is contained in a statement signed by Umar in Sokoto.
He stressed that the PDP remained confident and hopeful in the judicial processes to reclaim his mandate in a higher court.
” I wish to express our deep appreciation to the people of Sokoto state for support and prayers since we began the struggle to reclaim our stolen mandate.
” We also give all gratitude to Allah that we have successfully reached the first milestone in our quest to serve the good people of Sokoto state through participation in the Democratic process.
” Our ambition is to render service by the approval and mandate of our people through the instrument of a free and fair election.” Umar said.
He reassure their supporters and the electorates that they are part of this struggle, which we shall pursue with all zeal and commitment.
” Today’s ruling of the Governorship Election Tribunal is only a stage in our struggle to reclaim that mandate of the electorate, who are confident of our sincerity of purpose and competence to deliver service and good leadership.
” My running mate and I and indeed our party, recognize the role of our nation’s Judiciary, as the last hope of the common man and we are well aware that it is only through recourse to it that justice can be attained,” he said.
He further called on people to remain focused, calm and law-abiding as well as rededicate themselves to the task of retrieving the mandate through the only civilized instrument that is available which is rule of law.
The Sokoto Governorship Election Petition Tribunal on Saturday dismissed the petition against Gov. Aliyu and his Deputy, Idris Gobir, filed by Umar of PDP.
Umar is challenging the election of Aliyu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Gobir over an alleged non qualification and electoral fraud during the March 18, 2023 governorship election.
In a unanimous judgment. the Tribunal Chairman, Justice Haruna Mshelia, held that the petitioners were unable to prove the six grounds formulated in the petition.
He said that the grounds bordered on alleged ineligibility for Aliyu and Gobir to contest, falsification of certificates, variation of names, election frauds and non compliance with electoral guidelines.
