The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) says 75 per cent of pre-election litigations the commission was joined in were due to lack of internal democracy and leadership tussles among political parties.
INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitah, in an interview with the newsmen in Awka on Wednesday, when responding to question if he was concerned about issue of lack of internal democracy among registered political parties in Nigeria.
Amupitan said that he was bordered by the menace because of the impact on the electoral process and Nigeria democracy.
“It bothers me because of the money and the time wasted. Every party going to court, they must join INEC. When INEC is joined, the commission must go to court, engage lawyers, we pay for them, which is not cheap.
“I was informed that 75 per cent of our litigations are in respect of pre-election matters, mostly dealing with political party tussles, and leadership.
“Also, primaries that are conducted contrary to the provisions of the constitutions of the party,’’ he said.
Amupitan said that Nigerians continue to scrutinise the country’s elections but ignored the political party’s recruitment process for their candidates and internal democracy.
He said that INEC, saddled with the responsibility to monitor the parties was strengthening its “monitoring capabilities’’ to ensure that they were well regulated.
“That does not mean it’s not being done. However, we have also seen some loopholes within the law such that, like all these leadership problems of one party today.
In fact, as you were speaking, an Abuja Federal High Court says PDP don’t hold convention. Another order from Ibadan, says PDP must hold convention,’’ he said.
Also responding to question on new party registration, Amupitan said that the party was bond by the law to registered political associations that meet the requirements for registration.
He cited a court case involving Musa and INEC, where the Supreme Court made it clear that it’s part of INEC constitutional responsibility to register political parties.
“We are constrained in several ways. If you meant the requirement of the Constitution and of the Electoral Act, of course, the freedom of association. That was the argument of the courts.
“As speak today, we are looking at some applications. So if you meet the criteria that is established, after proper evaluation and monitoring, then we can consider registration of additional political parties.
On his view for calls to establish special court to for election related matters, Amupitan said election tribunals were already special court for election related matters.
He said that the creation of another special court required constitution amendment process, noting that while constitutional amendment process is ongoing right, it remains a very tedious task.
“Let me also say that the election tribunals established under the constitution, they are also special courts, because they are courts specifically for the purpose of the election.
“ After the election proceedings, up to the Court of Appeal, they cease to be election petitioner tribunals. Even though they are manned by regular judges.
“For instance, when the Court of Appeal is exercising its powers as presidential election tribunal, it’s not the Court of Appeal anymore, It’s a special court.
“Even if you’re sitting in Abuja, you don’t have the same panel in Abuja. A special panel is created for that purpose.
“So, we already have specialised courts for the purposes of handling election petition, but the issues have to do with maybe the time it takes to conclude election matters.
“That is part of what is going on in the amendment process, to see how the time can be reduced and maybe some of the technicalities can also be addressed,’’ he said.
