Lawyer ​‌‍‌‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‍⁠‌​​‍‌‌​sues NDC over alleged refusal to announce Anambra primary result

A legal practitioner, Mr Obunike Ohaegbu, has sued the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) over alleged refusal to announce the result of the primary election for Nnewi North/Nnewi South/Ekwusigo Federal Constituency of Anambra.
Ohaegbu, who filed the suit in the Federal High Court in Abuja against five defendants, is seeking an order compelling the party to announce the result of the primary election conducted in May 2026 to nominate its candidate for the 2027 general election.
The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1219/26, lists the NDC, Dr Ebere Onunkwo, Dr Socrates Ebo, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and Mr Peter Uzokwe as the first to fifth defendants, respectively.
The plaintiff claimed that he participated in the primary election and scored the majority of the lawful votes cast at the poll.
He, however, alleged that the NDC refused to declare the result at the venue and instead secretly adopted Uzokwe as its candidate for the constituency, in breach of the party’s primary election guidelines.
Ohaegbu is therefore seeking an order directing the NDC to declare him the winner of the primary election conducted for the constituency.
He is also seeking an order compelling the party to submit and upload his name and particulars to INEC as its duly nominated candidate for the constituency.
In addition, the plaintiff is asking the court to restrain the NDC, its officers, agents or privies from submitting or recognising any other person as its candidate for the constituency.
He is also seeking an order restraining INEC from accepting, recognising, publishing or acting upon the name of any person other than him as the party’s candidate for the constituency.
At Monday’s proceedings, hearing could not go on after the court discovered that the 2nd, 3rd and 5th defendants had not been served with the mandatory hearing notice and were not in court.
Although counsel to the plaintiff, Mr Ifeanyi Nrilike, confirmed to Justice Mohammed Umar that the parties had filed and exchanged the necessary processes, the judge directed that hearing notices be served on the absent defendants.
Justice Umar consequently adjourned the matter until October 14 for hearing and ordered that evidence of service of the hearing notice on all the parties must be presented before the adjourned date.